{"id":15446,"date":"2017-11-16T01:39:48","date_gmt":"2017-11-16T06:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.escapeartist.com\/?p=15446"},"modified":"2020-09-07T08:22:27","modified_gmt":"2020-09-07T12:22:27","slug":"paradise-papers-demystified","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.escapeartist.com\/blog\/paradise-papers-demystified\/","title":{"rendered":"The Paradise Papers: Demystified"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sunday before last (November 5, 2017), 13.4 million documents (emails, bank statements, loan agreements) relating to offshore investments were leaked through German newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung and offered to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). Nicknamed the \u201cParadise Papers,\u201d the documents link some incredibly high-profile individuals and companies to offshore tax havens, detailing around $10 trillion USD in foreign holdings.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

Similar to 2016\u2019s leaked \u201cPanama Papers,\u201d these documents have incited outrage from government officials and media outlets who feel there is an ethical breach in the ability of the ultra-rich and the well-connected to pay less taxes than those in lower income brackets. The majority of the documents were stolen from Appleby, a Bermuda-based firm that helps people set up in offshore jurisdictions. Appleby maintains that it has broken no laws – and as the details pour in, this seems increasingly true.<\/p>\n

Now many of you who have read my column throughout the years know that I am a huge fan of reporting and paying what is owed. But I am also a huge fan of the famous quote by Justice Learned Hand who said,<\/p>\n

\"The<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cAnyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

This seems right and fair, doesn\u2019t it? If you want to pay more, then by all means, go right ahead and write the IRS an extra check.<\/p>\n

But what about all this indignation over the Paradise Papers? Would it change how people felt if they knew that the U.S. is the largest tax haven in the world? \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0How about that the U.S. won\u2019t cooperate with the rest of the world on tax schemes that allow foreigners from everywhere else to hide their money here? \u00a0\u00a0Did you know that according to the Financial Transparency Coalition in Delaware, you actually need to provide more information to obtain a library card than to start a company?<\/p>\n

Hmmmm. \u00a0More on the U.S. government\u2019s hypocrisy regarding tax havens after a brief description of the \u201cParadise Papers\u201d and the reality behind the media hype.<\/p>\n

Defining a Tax Haven<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

The term \u201ctax haven\u201d usually refers to countries or regions that have favorable tax regulations for foreign nationals. These countries allow people or companies from all over the world to pay less money in taxes than if they were only operating out of their home country. To qualify, people may need to establish a connection to the country, such as opening bank accounts, purchasing property, or incorporating their businesses in the tax haven country.<\/p>\n

The demand for international tax planning has spiked in popularity over the last half decade. According to\u00a0The Guardian<\/a>, \u201cOver the past 40 years, offshore tax regimes have grown exponentially; back in the 1970s, they were a way for individuals to hide their money from corrupt and predatory governments in unstable countries, or for banks to move cash around to avoid fluctuations in currency rates.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tax Avoidance vs. Tax Evasion<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

Despite media scrutiny, the real issue here is that most of these structures and tax plans are completely legal, both in the tax haven country and the client\u2019s home country.<\/p>\n

While some involved in the leaked documents are being cast in a negative light, the overwhelming majority of the data shows no sign of foul play or illegal activity. Instead, it shows resourceful individuals\u00a0playing within the rules in order to maximize their wealth<\/a>. It is this kind of big-picture thinking that achieved success for these people in the first place.<\/p>\n

There is a big distinction between\u00a0Tax Avoidance<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Tax Evasion<\/strong><\/em>. It is in this distinction that we separate law-abiding ingenuity from illicit activity.<\/p>\n

Tax Avoidance<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n

Tax avoidance is a legal method in which people reduce their worldwide tax rate by planting flags abroad to take advantage of loopholes and offshore tax havens. There may be a stigma associated with international tax planning, but that\u2019s only because the majority of people don\u2019t fully understand it. When done properly, tax avoidance is an intelligent and legal way to protect your money. Currently, it has only been reported that the Paradise Papers show examples of solid and legal international tax planning.<\/p>\n

Tax Evasion<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n

On the contrary, tax evasion is an illicit and usually illegal act of bypassing the tax obligations of the country in which you earn or store your money. Evasion involves conscious deception, manifested in such acts as failing to file returns or declaring your full taxable income, or hiding taxable assets. This is a major offense, resulting in large fines and possible jail time, and is to be avoided at all costs.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

Criticism and Concerns<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

While the Appleby Firm is at the center of the Paradise Papers talk, this isn\u2019t the first time they\u2019ve been the subject of scrutiny. The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) had, in recent years, flagged the firm for what they saw as flawed compliance procedures and forced changes to their anti-money-laundering and know-your-client procedures.<\/p>\n

As the\u00a0BBC recently detailed<\/a>\u00a0of a consultant to Appleby:<\/p>\n

\u201cJames O’Toole, a British lawyer who has made his own fortune by advising the wealthy how to dodge tax\u2026.<\/p>\n

He was an “investment advisor” to a Mauritian company which owns his mansion in Northumberland.<\/p>\n

He has also \u201cnot owned\u201d two Aston Martins, a BMW, a Range Rover, luxury watches including a Rolex, and a Harley Davidson motorbike – which were all kept at his home.<\/p>\n

Some of the cash came from the huge fees he charges clients.<\/p>\n

One British couple were charged \u00a3960,000 for tax advice by Mr O’Toole’s company – \u00a3827,000 of that cash was paid straight into the offshore bank account connected to Mr. O’Toole’s company.\u201d<\/p>\n

There are three primary concerns for international tax planning advocates such as Appleby:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The Paradise Papers will further hurt the reputation of offshore financial centers<\/li>\n
  2. Publicity will invite more hackers looking to access records and leak documents<\/li>\n
  3. Global authorities will push for tighter tax rules onshore, as well as for greater transparency offshore. (Financial Times<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    While the second concern will result in more money being allocated to strengthen the web security of these firms, and the third concern is a bit of a call\/response waiting game, the first concern is interestingly viewed in the data post-2016\u2019s Panama Papers leak.<\/p>\n

    While the Panama Papers uncovered some illegal dealings, the majority of the transactions described in the Paradise Papers show overwhelmingly legal and high quality international tax planning.<\/p>\n

    And while the Panama Papers look a bit unsavory compared to the Paradise Papers, the primary law firm at the center of the Panama Papers, Mossack Fonseca, has somehow survived what many believed to be a death sentence to the company.<\/p>\n

    Appleby feels they can overcome this setback. Fionnuala Lynch, a tax partner with McCarthy Denning,\u00a0said of the matter<\/a>, \u201cWhen the Panama Papers came out, a lot of corruption was exposed. With the Paradise Papers, you see a lot of tax planning but not much dirty money.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Key Names Linked to the Paradise Papers<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n