| Anson
and Quigley were close friends. They were joint owners in a small
company that ran a sight seeing boat doing harbour tours in a city popular
with tourists.
The business
had been growing nicely from its fitful start some six years ago.
In fact they had sold the initial boat and upgraded to a character wood
vessel that was much admired by their many clients as it plied the waters
of this lovely harbour city, stopping here and there to point out and admire
the local architecture or attraction.
The boat was
very expensive and they and their wives had gone on the hook to the bank
to finance it but they were confident it would pay off very well.
Even though
Anson and Quigley were close friends, they did not share common views on
personal finances.
Anson was by
far the more cautious but when he broached the subject of protection from
any potential catastrophic event, Quigley would shrug off any of Anson’s
suggestions and say that he was quite content with the coverage of their
insurance package and change the subject.
Anson would
drop the subject but set his own plans in motion.
Murphy was
aboard their boat one day about a year ago and of course that was the day
that if anything could go wrong, it went wrong huge!
An elderly
passenger had come aboard and was enjoying the day when, on disembarking,
he caught his shoe on a gangway cleat and pitched himself clean over the
side guard chain and into the water between the boat and the dock.
On the way down he hit his head on a piling.
They rescued
the passenger promptly but sadly the hit on the head proved damaging to
the extent that the poor old gentlemen suffered brain damage and was confined
to a wheel chair.
You would be
right in expecting that the gentleman and his goading and expectant relatives
would drop the writ promptly and they did.
The long and
the short of it was that the settlement exceeded their insurance by a very
large amount.
When the prosecuting
attorneys did their examination for discovery to expose the partners assets
outside the business they found that Quigley had a fully paid for house,
a sizeable investment portfolio, a piece of investment property, a large
motor home, an antique car and a stamp collection which over the years
had become Quigley’s pride and joy and was now worth a tidy sum.
They took
it all. Even the stamp collection.
When they looked
into Anson’s affairs they found that his house was worthless because it
was mortgaged to the hilt. The mortgage was held by a company domiciled
in Panama and duly registered in all the right places.
Anson had been
making payment as required.
He had a few
thousand in his checking account, a used car and that was pretty well it.
There was
nothing more to see or attach—so they gave up on trying getting anything
more out of Anson.
The old gentleman’s
fall had cost both partners equally in business assets but when it came
to the private stuff, Quigley was wiped out and Anson survived almost unscathed.
When it was
all over, Quigley asked his friend just what he had squirreled away, where
and how.
Anson reminded
Quigley of how often he had tried to steer him the right way and how Quigley
had ignored him.
They are still
friends but probably won’t go into business together again and every now
and then they meet at the pub and hoist one together and Quigley looks
at his friend--- and wonders.
Epilogue:
Anson had enlisted
the aid of an accountant he knew who specialised in offshore financial
planning.
No one knows
for sure whether he owns that ranch that he visits often in Mexico, an
investment portfolio in the Turks and Caicos and a hefty bank balance in
a well known US bank. No one knows for sure because nothing is registered
in his own name.
Question:
Which one are
you?
Anson or Quigley?
.
| The author
Shikari Jones has been involved in the financial services sector most of
his life and has travelled extensively offshore where he maintains high
quality contacts to assist his clients in asset protection structuring.
Please visit www.offshoreandprivate.com
for more information. |
|
|