| Panama
Ranks High in Latin American Capital Access |
| A Special
Report from Latin Business Chronical |
| Panama makes splashing
debut as the second-best place in Latin America for capital access. |
| According
to the latest Capital Access Index compiled by the Milken Institute, Panama
ranks second only to Chile as the best place in Latin America to access
capital.
In three
subcategories, Panama scored higher than Chile.
The index of
98 countries worldwide looks at five key components that can make it easier
or more difficult for entrepreneurs to access capital. Those components
are: |
|
|
|
|
|
-
Economic Environment
-
Banking Development
-
Capital Market
Development
-
International
Environment
-
and Sovereign
Ratings
The Milken Institute
defines "entrepreneur" broadly, including innovators, managers and owners.
The capital
they are seeking may be used to start a new enterprise, expand a promising
line of business, or restructure a large multiindustry firm, the institute
says. However, the degree of capital access is not only relevant to a few,
but can have a major impact on equality in a country, according to an analysis
of the index. "Countries with high levels of inequality tend to be characterized
by substantial barriers to capital, thus, other things being equal, underperform
economically as they prevent their citizens from making full use of their
human capital," the Milken Institute says in its analysis. |
|
|
| Case in point:
Chile is among the richest countries in Latin America, Paraguay among the
poorest.
This year,
three new countries from Latin America were added (see tables below), bringing
to 18 the total from the region. Of the original 15 countries from last
year's index, 12 saw declines in their scores, while only three saw an
improvement.
However, the
declines in Latin America were not unique on a global scale, where 57 of
the 98 countries on the index saw decreases (including the United States
and the United Kingdom).
While Chile
continued to hold its position as the leader in Latin America, its score
and global ranking fell compared with last year's index. Chile's score
of 4.53 points represented a 0.19 point decline, while its rank fell from
24 to 29. |
|
|
Offshore
Resources Gallery
|
|
|
| But Chile's
score still puts it ahead of such countries as Italy, Thailand and Hungary.
In three
subcategories, Panama scored higher than Chile.
Panama, which
was one of the new countries added to the index, made a splashing debut
as the second-best place in Latin America for capital access. Its score
of 4.19 points gives it a rank of 34, ahead of countries like China, Poland
and Egypt.
In three subcategories
- macro-economic environment, banking governance and advanced capital markets,
Panama actually scored higher than Chile.
Thanks largely
to only using the U.S. dollar during its entire 99-year history, Panama
has been able to maintain one of the lowest inflation rates in Latin America
and one that often has been lower than that of the United States itself.
In addition to hosting one of Latin America's top international banking
centers, Pamama also boasts a relatively large number of domestic banks.
And since the dollar is the legal currency, the country's central bank
has limited authority, it neither prints money nor owns or bails out local
banks. |
|
|
| The other
Latin American countries that were added this year were the Dominican Republic
and Paraguay.
The Dominican
Republic scored a respectable 3.61 points, which places it around the middle
of the Latin American ranking and 67 on the global ranking.
But Paraguay
fared significantly worse, debuting with a score of 3.00 points, which
gave it the last place on the Latin America list and among the last on
the global ranking - 89 of 98 countries. Countries that were worse than
Paraguay include Zimbabwe and Russia.
Uruguay saw
the strongest increase, achieving a score of 3.55 points. That was 0.48
points more than last year and the highest increase of any country on the
global index. |
|
|
Offshore
Resources Gallery
|
| As a result
of the improved score, Uruguay jumped from 80 to 72 on the global ranking,
the only Latin American country to move up.
Honduras and
Guatemala also saw slight increases in their scores, but fell on the rankings.
The declines were due to a combination of other countries achieveing higher
score increases as well as the fact that the global list this year includes
16 new countries.
Bolivia saw
the worst decline in terms of its score, from 4.08 last year to 3.61 this
year. That decline was the worst on the global index and also led Bolivia
to fall 22 places on the ranking - from 45 last year to 67 this year.
Bolivia's decline
was largely due to a perceived decline in the quality of its economic institutions,
according to the analysis of the index. The country's score on institional
environment was among its lowest.
Additionally,
the banking structure is less competitive as the barriers to entry increased
- aspects that are magnified by the lack of bond and venture capital market
development, the Milken Institute says.
Another major
loser was Nicaragua, which received 0.30 points less this year and a fall
in rank from 39 to 52.
Not surprisingly,
Argentina also saw a significant decrease. Its score went from 4.31 points
last year to 4.02 this year and its ranking fell from 35 to 45. The capital
access decrease in Argentina was driven by the country's economic crisis,
debt default, portfolio outflows and downgrade of its sovereign debt by
Moody’s, the Milken Institute said.
"The consequences
of government involvement in business, limits to the withdrawal of deposits
and the restructuring of debt in the name of macroeconomic stability will
likely be long-term and at a microeconomic level," the analysis said. "These
actions have increased the overall opaqueness of the economy, which in
turn will increase the long-run cost of capital. Unless Argentina can quickly
restore investors’ confidence on the issues of property rights, creditor
and shareholder rights, and the involvement of government in businesses,
entrepreneurs' access to capital will continue to fall."
Chile is
the best Latin American country for an entrepreneur to gain access to capital,
while Paraguay is the worst, according to the 2002 Capital Access Index
compiled by the Milken Institute. Argentina dropped to third place compared
to last year's list, partly due to Panama being added to the list, debuting
right behind Chile. Paraguay also made its debut, but ended up last. Meanwhile
Uruguay, which was the worst performer last year, improved its situation
and jumped to 13th place on the Latin American list. The index of 98 countries
worldwide (including 18 in Latin America) looks at a combination of factors
that can make it easy or difficult to access capital such as the depth,
governance and repression of banking in a country; the equity, bonds and
advancement level of capital markets; portfolio and foreign direct investment
flows; macroeconomic and institutional environments and sovereign debt
ratings. |
|
Article
Index ~ Panama
Index ~ |