
Toothless Penalties Becoming a tax exile is not without problems, but, so far, they are more political than legal. The source of the current controversy over expatriation was a sensational article in the Nov. 24, 1994 issue of Forbes magazine, entitled “The New Refugees.” Filled with juicy details (famous names, luxury addresses, big dollar tax savings), the story described how clever ex-Americans who became citizens of certain foreign nations, paid little or no U.S. federal and state income, estate and capital gains taxes. Ever since, expatriation has been
a favorite “hot button” issue kicked around by the American news media
and “soak-the-rich” politicians.8 While current anti-expat provisions in
the U.S. Tax Code are relatively toothless, this status may soon change.
On July 25, 2003 legislation (HR 2896) was introduced in the U.S. House
of Representatives by Rep. William M. Thomas (R-Cal.), powerful chairman
of the tax-writing Committee on Ways and Means. This bill includes an ominous
Sec. 2005, entitled “Revision of Tax Rules on Expatriation of Individuals.”
This section, in effect, would impose an immediate tax on unrealized capital gains on anyone who ends their U.S. citizenship. It uses an arbitrary test of net worth and/or income tax paid over a period of years to assume an ex-citizen is trying to escape income taxes. Similar net worth / income tax provisions have been the law since 1996, which I’ll explain in a moment. It’s understandable why politicians keep this political football in play. To the average uninformed U.S. taxpayer, expatriation seems like just another rich man’s tax loophole. Before Forbes raised the issue, few people had even heard of the concept of formal surrender or loss of U.S. citizenship. Taken together with the recent controversy over U.S. companies re-incorporating offshore to avoid U.S. corporate taxes (which is completely legal), candidates for federal office have in expatriation a convenient straw man that they can beat unmercifully. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers (now president of Harvard University) went so far as to call tax expatriates “traitors” to America. He later was forced to apologize. Your Right to Give Up U.S. Citizenship As a national political issue, expatriation is hardly new. In the bitter aftermath of the War Between the States (1860-65), Congress hotly debated the status of people in the southern states that formed the Confederacy. Ultimately, Congress decided “rebels” who swore allegiance could again become U.S. citizens. The “Expatriation Act of 1868” formally recognized that all Americans do have a right to give up their citizenship, if they so choose. A century later, in the Foreign Investors Tax Act of 1966, Congress again decided to make an issue of expatriation. In that Act, lawmakers tried to impose onerous taxes on exiting wealthy Americans who relinquished their U.S. citizenship “with the principal purpose of avoiding” U.S. taxes, a highly subjective intention that was virtually impossible to prove. The IRS couldn’t prove such “intent” and very rarely even tried. A 1996 anti-expatriation law inspired by the Forbes article asserts limited U.S. tax jurisdiction for a period of 10 years over persons who renounce their U.S. citizenship “with the principal purpose of avoiding U.S. taxes.” Also covered by this law are permanent resident aliens (“green card” holders) or anyone else who has resided in the United States for any eight of the preceding 15 years. For the purposes of this law, tax avoidance is presumed to be the true purpose if, at the time of expatriation, an expatriate’s net worth exceeds US$552,000 or he or she pays an annual tax bill exceeding US$110,000, figures that are indexed for inflation annually. However, with proper planning, it is relatively easy to avoid U.S. taxes during this 10-year period. The lengths to which politicians will go to penalize expatriates is demonstrated by a never-enforced provision of U.S. law, also enacted in 1996, that permits the Attorney General to bar from returning to the United States anyone who renounces their U.S. citizenship to avoid U.S. taxes. In this manner, Congress lumped individuals exercising their legal right to avoid taxes with narcotics traffickers and terrorists. Amidst the furor, thoughtful experts criticize what they see as a much broader and dangerous U.S. anti-expatriation precedent. They point out these laws involve not only retaliatory government acts against resistance to high taxes, but pose possible violations of human rights guaranteed by other laws and even the Human Rights Charter of the United Nations. It is worth noting that the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed the right of U.S. citizens to end their citizenship as well as the right to enjoy dual citizenship. In reality, this political frenzy probably reflects collective envy more than any sense of patriotism by Americans or their congressional representatives. Expatriation is not as serious a problem as some pretend: fewer than 800 Americans, rich or poor, have formally given up their citizenship in recent years. Most expatriates give up their U.S. citizenship because they are returning to their native lands or marrying non-U.S. citizens. Save Millions of Dollars, Legally Despite the controversy, there remain very substantial tax savings for wealthy U.S. citizens who are prepared to give up their citizenship. While only a handful of very rich Americans have legally expatriated, these individuals include some prominent names: In 1962, John Templeton, respected international investor, businessman and philanthropist, surrendered his U.S. citizenship to become a citizen of the Bahamas. This move saved him more than US$100 million when he sold the well-known international investment fund that still bears his name. Other wealthy ex-Americans who have taken their formal leave include billionaire Campbell Soup heir John (“Ippy”) Dorrance III (Ireland); Michael Dingman (The Bahamas), chairman of Abex and a Ford Motor director; J. Mark Mobious (Germany), one of the leading emerging market investment fund managers; Kenneth Dart (Belize), heir to the billion dollar Dart container fortune; Ted Arison (Israel), head of Carnival Cruise Lines; and millionaire head of Locktite Corp., Fred Kreible (Turks and Caicos Islands). How It Should Be Done Long before you formally give up your U.S. citizenship, you should reorder your financial affairs in such a way as to remove from possible government control and taxation most, if not all, of your assets. Here are the steps you must take: • Move abroad and make your new home
in a no-tax foreign nation so you are no longer a “resident” for U.S. income
taxes;
Year Action Plan
One of the most important decisions is the choice of a second nationality. Millions of Americans already hold a second nationality; millions more qualify almost instantly for one by reason of birth, ancestry or marriage. For instance, in many countries (Ireland is one), having a parent or grandparent born in that country will qualify children or grandchildren for immediate citizenship and passports after presenting the appropriate documentation. Otherwise, you will need to qualify for alternative citizenship through prolonged residency (2-10 years) in a country in which you are eligible for residency based on your economic status or investments you make there. For instance, both Panama and Belize have formal tax-advantaged residency plans for foreign nationals who wish to make their home there. After five years, sometimes less, you can apply for citizenship. Alternatively, you may choose to purchase economic citizenship, which can be obtained in a matter of months, but only at significant cost (minimum outlay of approximately US$100,000). The only two legitimate economic citizenship programs still in existence are from the Commonwealth of Dominica and St. Kitts & Nevis. For more information on these programs, see the Henley & Partners Web site at www.henleyglobal.com/ec - Based on an exclusive arrangement with Henley & Partners, Sovereign Society members are eligible for a significant reduction of the applicable professional fees. Before making any move, it’s absolutely essential to consult qualified professionals.13 We are pleased to provide the names of qualified professional advisors if you contact us at info@thesovereignsociety.com - . |