| How about
if the escapee is a decorated Viet Nam war veteran? Is he still a
traitor or are the traitors in Congress? How about if he is someone
whose son was shot and wounded in his high school gym, or whose daughter
was raped coming home from choir practice? Or how about someone who
is disgusted with the filth shown on American television and in the movie
theaters?
What does
this legislation mean to those who leave for moral reasons? What about
those who leave because they don't want to live in a country with metal
detectors in schools, with white racist dragging a black from the back
of a truck until he is broken into pieces, with black racists hanging whites
in downtown Los Angeles, with anti-Jewish fanatics shooting children in
nurseries, with teenage kids machine gunning their classmates? Will
those that leave be required to take some kind of test to show they are
moral
expatriates and not tax expatriates? What kind of test?
If I find the actions of Congress in this matter repugnant and immoral,
and I do, would that qualify me as a moral expatriate?
Despite these
congressional efforts to create a jurisdictional prison, leaving America
hasn't lost its popularity. Far from it. Most of those leaving are simply
leaving without saying good-bye - (see IRS
Loses Bid To Track Overseas Tax-Dodgers in a previous issue of this magazine.
- Click Here -) Tens of thousands of Americans have left
and the US government has no way to track them. However some are still
going to the trouble of renouncing despite the straw watchdog Congress
created. Several thousand people have turned in their citizenship or green
cards within the past few years, and over half of them did so after Congress
tried to create it's jurisdictional prison.
The law
that Congress created states that if the purpose of avoiding taxes
is among our principal motives for renouncing, then they can collect estate
taxes and income taxes on U.S. earnings and investment income for the next
ten years. They don't have to prove we were motivated by tax purposes.
If our net worth is over $500,000 or our income tax bill is over $100,000,
they presume our motives are tax related. Libya and the United States are
among the small number of nations brutal enough to tax their citizens on
all income worldwide to begin with. Now Congress would like to extend
their worldwide taxation clause to include a taxation in perpetuity clause.
Those scientists who claim that a perpetual motion machine is an impossibility
should turn to the U.S. Congress for answers.
How does this
effect those who aren't worth a half a million and don't have $100,000
tax obligations? As stated elsewhere on this website most Americans
have decided to slip quietly away without saying good-bye. Most often
when an expatriate goes abroad they are effectively off of the radar.
Those we've talked to simply restart their lives abroad, get a second passport
and drop out of the American system. Those that are intent on returning
should read the article Expat Tax - U.S. Taxation of American's Living
Abroad in this issue. Most expatriates I've talked to have lowered
their taxes to zero. As mentioned in the book Escape From America
the structuring of one's expatriate tax obligations can be done in such
a way as to reduce them to zero in most cases. If you can do this for ten
years and not spend more than 30 days in the USA during that period you
can then renounce without presumption of guilt. If you hold dual
citizenship from birth you can return to the other country without presumption
of guilt. If you or one of your parents was born abroad you can become
a citizen of that country without presumption of guilt and so on.
For those who
do feel the necessity to renounce, there are enough loopholes to prevent
the virtual prison legislation from being much more than a scare tactic.
Everyone who has legally challenged the presumption of guilt clause has
won. The Immigration & Naturalization Service so far has not barred
anyone from returning to the U.S. after renouncing. It is clear that the
laws that Congress wrote were written to prevent a massive exodus not to
go after those who have the courage to renounce.
It is a brutal
and ugly piece of legislation and it is a disgrace to the U.S. Congress.
If people no longer want to live in a country, any country, they should
be allowed to leave with their possessions. That Congress should try to
create a virtual prison is clear sign to us of what America is now becoming.
It is an undeclared war zone where most elderly people have to lock themselves
inside their homes in order to feel safe. Forty million Americans are murdered,
maimed, raped, mugged, or robbed every year. Tens of millions of Americans
live in an American prison. America has the highest prison population in
the world. It is one of the most violent countries on earth. People are
tired of paying so high a rate of taxes into a system that is spiraling
downhill - a system that does little to increase their freedom - and into
a society that is becoming morally bankrupt and vehemently wants to pretend
that it is not. Could the doors suddenly slam shut trapping millions of
American's inside, just as people were trapped inside the Soviet Union
and Nazi Germany? It's a question worthy of speculation. When
the ether wears off and more and more American's discover they've been
hoodwinked there could be a massive exodus. What Congress will do
to stop them is open to conjecture.
Since this
article was written the US Government has made 'agreements' with numerous
foreign nations regarding Americans seeking residency in those nations.
The US Government has 'obligated' many nations to force those Americans
seeking residency to send an Interpol generated letter to the FBI stating
that they are seeking residency in a foreign nation. Several readers
have written in stating that they've been obligated to report to the FBI
that they were seeking residency in a foreign nation. We asked officials
of several nations why they were agreeing to this invasion into to their
private affairs. One official summed it up by saying, "...we are
more or less obligated to comply, even though it is not on our law books,
we have to do what the US Government requests."
...now you know. You have to do what the US Government requests wherever
you are, even though the President of the USA has a 91 IQ and has committed
crimes against humanity. What an irony - - it would be funny if it
wasn't so tragic. |